2024 Honda ZR-V
The Good: – Practical size and features – Seating space and cabin trim – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Below average boot space – Pricier than rivals – No sunroof option |
The Good: – Practical size and features – Seating space and cabin trim – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Below average boot space – Pricier than rivals – No sunroof option |
The Good: – Clean styling inside and out – Good cabin space – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Tight third row – Pricier than rivals – Not particularly quick |
The Good: – Handsome looks – Fair cabin space – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Small boot space – Slightly pricier than rivals – Not very fast |
The Good: – Better styling inside and out – Cabin space and features – Very comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Bit pricey with options – Few hard-plastic cabin bits – No performance improvement |
The Good: – Good fuel economy – Great cabin space and features – Spritely handling |
The Bad: – Higher-than-average pricing – Slower than old model – Rear drum brakes |
The Good: – Coupe-like styling – Cabin space and features – Power, ride and handling |
The Bad: – Bit pricey with options – Few hard-plastic cabin bits – Some rivals are quieter |
The Good: – Coupe-like styling – Cabin space and features – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Bit pricey with options – Few hard-plastic cabin bits – Some rivals are quieter |
The Good: – Immense, versatile cabin – Surprisingly powerful – Great ride and handling |
The Bad: – Third-row seat access – Some cabin hard-plastic bits – Expensive with options |
The Good: – Immense, practical cabin – Competent handler – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – A bit pricey in its class – Lots of cabin hard plastics – Bit noisy at highway speeds |
The Good: – Decent looks – Cabin space and practicality – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – No low-range gearing – Slightly pricier than rivals – Some hard cabin plastics |